# SyncTalent.ai > Agent-driven recruitment automation for IT staffing agencies (C2C subcontracting and bench redeployment). Six AI agents plus one orchestrator take a job requirement from chaotic inbound — email, Telegram, WhatsApp, job boards — all the way to a submitted, monitored candidate. The single proof metric is time-to-redeploy: how many days a benched consultant stays idle. SyncTalent.ai is a product of AgenticQuay Inc. Pricing is zero dollars upfront, metered compute at cost plus a flat 12%, and one flat fee per placement charged only when a candidate confirms a start date. Work authorization (USC / GC / EAD / H1B / OPT) is enforced as a hard filter at every step — there is no override. ## Product - [Home](https://synctalent.ai/): What the platform does, the six agents, and the time-to-redeploy proof metric. - [How it works](https://synctalent.ai/how-it-works/): The pipeline end to end — intake and dedup, shortlist, outreach, screening, submission, monitoring. - [Pricing](https://synctalent.ai/pricing/): No subscription or seat fees; metered compute at cost +12%; one flat placement fee. - [Bench ROI calculator](https://synctalent.ai/roi/): What one idle bench day costs, and the margin recovered by cutting time-to-redeploy. - [Integrations](https://synctalent.ai/integrations/): What we connect to today (Bullhorn via Merge.dev) and what is on the roadmap. - [Compare](https://synctalent.ai/compare/): Honest comparisons against Recruiterflow, Loxo, Bullhorn automation, and a manual bench-sales desk. - [Schedule a demo](https://synctalent.ai/book/): Book a walkthrough on your own live requirements. ## Answers - [FAQ](https://synctalent.ai/faq/): Sixteen direct answers on agents, compliance, ATS sync, security, data handling, and cost. - [Support](https://synctalent.ai/support/): Help centre — onboarding, common issues, incident and security contacts, response times. - [Contact](https://synctalent.ai/contact/): Sales, support, and security addresses with expected response times. ## Comparisons - [SyncTalent.ai vs Recruiterflow](https://synctalent.ai/compare/synctalent-vs-recruiterflow/): Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM; SyncTalent.ai is an agent layer that writes into the ATS you already run. - [SyncTalent.ai vs Loxo](https://synctalent.ai/compare/synctalent-vs-loxo/): Loxo solves candidate supply with its own database; SyncTalent.ai solves coordination on a bench you already have. - [Bullhorn AI automation alternative](https://synctalent.ai/compare/synctalent-vs-bullhorn-ai/): Not a replacement — an agent layer on top of Bullhorn for the judgement work rules cannot cover. - [AI agents vs manual bench sales](https://synctalent.ai/compare/ai-agents-vs-manual-bench-sales/): What bench sales automation software changes, and what still needs a human. ## Integrations - [Bullhorn](https://synctalent.ai/integrations/bullhorn/): Live. Reads job orders and candidates, writes submissions and notes back through Merge.dev. - [Merge.dev](https://synctalent.ai/integrations/merge-dev/): Live. The unified ATS connector layer; ATS credentials never reach SyncTalent.ai. - [JobDiva](https://synctalent.ai/integrations/jobdiva/): Roadmap only — not available today. - [Ceipal](https://synctalent.ai/integrations/ceipal/): Roadmap only — not available today. ## Glossary - [IT staffing glossary](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/): Definitions of the vocabulary US IT staffing runs on. - [Bench sales](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/bench-sales/): Marketing an agency's already-hired but unassigned consultants so they bill again. - [C2C (corp-to-corp)](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/c2c-corp-to-corp/): A contract where one incorporated business bills another for a consultant's services. - [Time-to-redeploy](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/time-to-redeploy/): Days between a consultant rolling off and confirming a start date on the next assignment. - [Right-to-represent](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/right-to-represent/): Written permission for one vendor to submit one consultant to one requirement. - [Vendor blast](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/vendor-blast/): Mass distribution of one requirement across many vendors, arriving repeatedly in different wording. - [W2 vs C2C vs 1099](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/w2-vs-c2c-vs-1099/): The three US contract tax terms and why rates are not comparable across them. - [Submittal-to-interview ratio](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/submittal-to-interview-ratio/): Share of submissions converting to a client interview — a quality signal, not an output measure. - [Prime vendor](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/prime-vendor/): Holds the direct end-client contract and distributes requirements to subcontractors. - [Implementation partner](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/implementation-partner/): Delivers a project for an end client and staffs it from its own and subcontracted people. - [Hotlist](https://synctalent.ai/glossary/hotlist/): The list of currently available consultants circulated to vendors to generate requirements. ## Resources - [Blog](https://synctalent.ai/blog/): Notes on agent-driven staffing, dedup economics, and AI cost control. - [Why time-to-redeploy is the only number that matters](https://synctalent.ai/blog/time-to-redeploy/): Why utilization and submittal counts are lagging vanity metrics. - [Duplicates are not noise — they are routes](https://synctalent.ai/blog/duplicates-are-routes/): How collapsing vendor blasts into one canonical requirement preserves margin leverage. - [Tiered models behind an AI gateway](https://synctalent.ai/blog/tiered-models-ai-gateway/): Defaulting to a fast, cheap model and escalating only on low confidence. - [How to reduce bench time in US IT staffing](https://synctalent.ai/blog/how-to-reduce-bench-time/): Measure where the idle days go, then remove waiting states rather than speeding people up. - [What is bench sales? A 2026 primer for agency owners](https://synctalent.ai/blog/what-is-bench-sales/): Why a bench exists, how a desk runs, where the money leaks, and which numbers matter. - [Why work authorization should be a hard filter, not a preference](https://synctalent.ai/blog/work-authorization-hard-filter/): Ranking by authorization fit lets an ineligible resume reach a client; a gate does not. - [The real cost of chasing the same requirement twice](https://synctalent.ai/blog/cost-of-chasing-twice/): Duplicates multiply every downstream stage, destroy price discovery, and cause RTR collisions. - [Semantic matching vs Boolean search for resume screening](https://synctalent.ai/blog/semantic-vs-boolean-matching/): Where each wins, where each fails, and why hard filters belong outside both. - [AI voice screening: what it captures that a phone screen misses](https://synctalent.ai/blog/ai-voice-screening/): Consistency and capacity, not insight — and what still needs a human. - [Building an AI cost governance layer for a staffing desk](https://synctalent.ai/blog/ai-cost-governance-staffing-desk/): Attribution, tiered routing, per-tenant caps, and idempotent retries. - [Bullhorn + AI agents: what a write-back workflow actually looks like](https://synctalent.ai/blog/bullhorn-write-back-workflow/): What is read, what is written back, and why write-back should start switched off. - [Sitemap](https://synctalent.ai/sitemap/): Every public page on one screen. ## Company - [About](https://synctalent.ai/about/): Why the platform was built and what it optimises for. - [Company](https://synctalent.ai/company/): AgenticQuay Inc. — the legal entity behind SyncTalent.ai. ## Legal - [Terms & Conditions](https://synctalent.ai/terms/) - [Privacy Policy](https://synctalent.ai/privacy/) - [Cookie Policy](https://synctalent.ai/cookies/) ## Optional - [Full facts file](https://synctalent.ai/llms-full.txt): Expanded product, pricing, agent, and FAQ content inline.